Gaddafi finally the West to take military action. After following the British law, Canada, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and other countries also announced to join. The Arab world, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other countries clearly support the no-fly zones set up in Libya; Qatar, United Arab Emirates is sending fighters to participate in patrols.
It was found that the multinational military action against Libya and behind the scene, are a bit "strange." cheap ghd hair straighteners Why suddenly the United Nations passed a resolution? hair straighteners ghd March 17, the UN Security Council by 10 votes in favor, 5 abstentions vote, adoption of resolution 1973, decided to establish no-fly zone in Libya. There is a concern in the resolution of content: "Gaddafi may take all measures to prevent attacks on civilians." This is the West paved the way for a military strike Gaddafi.
After the adoption of Security Council resolutions, French President Nicolas Sarkozy immediately invited the Arab League (Arab League), the head of the European Union and a number of leaders in Paris to discuss implementation of the resolution. 19, the summit ended, the participating parties announced that the Libyan government after the action "unacceptable", countries began its international intervention. Military strike begins. cheap ghd straighteners Why suddenly the Security Council passed a resolution? Resolution 1973 is undoubtedly under pressure in the West adopted. The Western countries eager to hand, due to Gaddafi had the momentum on the battlefield rapidly.
Libya, after the outbreak of unrest, the opposition's momentum once-Sheng, the fall of the West that Gaddafi soon. Meanwhile, most Western countries believe that the use of force against Libya, "too costly", and therefore more cautious. 11 March, EU leaders had refused to French and British military strikes proposal.
However, Gaddafi will soon turn the tables. The elite troops rapidly eastward, approaching Benghazi. West surprised, hands do not know if Gaddafi will regain the overall situation. So they began lobbying members of the Council: Gaddafi to play Garcia work, it will be "massacre", the international community must stop the "humanitarian disaster." ghd straighteners cheap Council parties have finally reached a compromise.
Why do the French lead the charge?
In promoting the process of military strikes against Libya, France and Britain the most active. Particularly France, to act as a vanguard role. The following reasons: ghd hair straightener First, France has a long colonial Africa, think where is its site. Sarkozy came to power, trying to promote the establishment of "French National Union" and the "Mediterranean Union", being their own boss, but it was Gaddafi boycott. Therefore, Sarkozy has been looking for opportunities to "clean up" Gaddafi. Now, he feels the opportunity to come - or even kill Gaddafi through lessons, both to themselves as "boss", but also improve the international status of France.
Second, France is the Western "human rights, democracy and freedom," the birthplace of the values, Sarkozy holding the "protection of human rights in Libya," the banner of the occupation, "the moral high ground", you can gain political points at home.
Third, the French oil companies billions of dollars in investment in Libya, the rebels came to power, France will become the biggest beneficiary; if Gaddafi stabilize the situation in France will pay a heavy economic price.
Fourth, Sarkozy initially misjudged the situation. Libyan civil war broke out, Gaddafi insisted that he could not arbitrarily long, not to seek the views of allies, first announced its recognition of the Libyan opposition to the regime and actively encouraging a military attack on Gaddafi. This has resulted in confusion and controversy within the EU, many people criticized him, "go too far." In this case, Sarkozy had no way out, bite the bullet and have to shoot. Therefore, the Security Council resolution passed soon, he will send out fighter, and dropped the first bomb.
Unlike France, the United Kingdom as a large number of interests in Libya, but also against Gaddafi's enthusiasm high. First, the United Kingdom and Libya have decades of resentment. 80s of last century, Gaddafi has money to support terrorist activities, the Irish Republican Army, and later created the Lockerbie air disaster. Despite the easing of bilateral relations after, but not be fundamentally improved. Second, the civil war in Libya, Gaddafi son armed suppression of the opposition, the British public opinion that he was "the nature of holding an" almost all of them as politicians, "the devil." Such an atmosphere, the British Prime Minister Cameron can only make a tough statement: "The resignation Gaddafi, Libya has he has no future."
Why the United States willing to be supporting?
In this military conflict, the United States rare when the "supporting role."
March 14, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton flew to Paris to meet Sarkozy and Libyan opposition leaders Jiabulile. She had worried that a group of Libyan opposition politicians to pursue the position of religious extremism, and may even be members of extremist organizations. But Jiabulile conversation, her doubts removed. Sarkozy added continuously sidelines in the side, Hillary Clinton come to realize that the United States if he did not take action, it may "backward." The next night, Obama senior generals to listen to the military and diplomatic options available, then instructed Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the UN Security Council mandate to promote the "take all necessary measures to protect civilians." Obviously, Obama is determined to use force against Gaddafi.
Even so, the United States still do not want to lead the charge. This is because: First, Obama clearly America's current situation. March 18, he said the war in Iraq and Afghanistan have stretched the United States very long, but the U.S. military but also to help the Japanese disaster relief. Therefore, the European and Arab allies will serve as the main character of military operations.
Second, the survey shows that more than Liucheng of Americans think the U.S. should not bear the responsibility to stop civil war in Libya. This opinion, so not interested in re-election campaign of Barack Obama Libyan involvement in the problem yourself too. Moreover, the war opened, Libya into "Iraq" or "Afghanistan" the possibility is not small, the United States worry about a relapse into war quagmire.
Third, the strategy in the United States in the Middle East, Libya is not in an important position, not worthy of the United States go to war.
Fourth, Britain and France has long been well-prepared, especially France, in the geographic proximity of Libya, is more suitable to play the main military action.
But analysts believe that U.S. military superiority, it is difficult to get rid of "leadership position." Libya to destroy the radar, the air weapons, Britain and France still have to rely on the U.S. military. Moreover, under the leadership of NATO in the United States, and its success or failure of military operations depends largely on the United States. Therefore, the future if the war expanded, the U.S. action may have to charge as usual dominance.
Why Arab countries to follow the West?
Gaddafi to clean up the West, is not surprising, but without the approval of the Arab world, things would be much more difficult. March 12, the Arab League foreign ministers convened in Cairo an emergency meeting to make important decisions - first, the Arab League will be formally proposed to the UN Security Council over the establishment of no-fly zone in Libya, to prevent mass casualty incidents continue to occur; Secondly, Libya, the Arab League will work with the opposition "National Committee" to contact. Arab League also stressed that all foreign forces against the armed intervention Libya.
This attitude of the Arab League, that Gaddafi has been isolated in the Arab world. On March 17 that the Security Council passed the resolution, resulting in a crucial impact. After the Arab League position, Russia, India and other countries quickly said it would not veto the resolution. Moreover, it seems in most European countries, the Arab League "against all foreign forces to intervene by force against Libya," the statement, just a gesture.
Analysts believe that the Arab League to make such a decision, not accidental. First, many Arab League member states and other countries that U.S. and British allies, and interests of Western countries is extremely close. Second, over the years, Gaddafi to other Arab countries made a lot of trouble, some countries have already disaffected to him, some even hope that he will soon step down.
It is worth mentioning that has an important influence in the Arab world, Saudi, Libya issues consistent with the United States. This is not only due to the close relations of interests between the two countries, but also with the contradiction between Gaddafi and Saudi Arabia on top. In 2003, Gaddafi had the Arab League summit in Saudi Arabia and the United States publicly criticized the "collusion" and support the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
Another concern of the State of Qatar. Announced to send fighters to participate in the multinational military action against Libya. Qatar reason why a positive attitude, because in the Gulf region, it has been higher in the dark with Saudi Arabia is low, the "coming to the fore," have their own political considerations.xzx5277
Commentaires
Il n'y a aucun commentaire sur cet article.